SCCR 24

  • Video Interviews and Press Coverage from SCCR 24
  • Final conclusions from SCCR 24
  • A treaty for visually impaired persons is long overdue but the US has still not agreed on the “nature” of the text!
  • EU proposal on “authorized entity”
  • Egypt questions EU on the applicability of the three-step test to Article 10.2 of the Berne Convention
  • July 24 SCCR 24 informals on blind treaty produce a text, but EU and US block real movement on treaty
  • KEI comment on SCCR 24
  • Kicking the can down the road? Draft conclusions for SCCR 24, from 10:45 PM, July 24, 2012
  • Latest text on the definition of authorized entity: Proposals for revised text for document SCCR/23/7
  • Proposal by Nigeria, Iran and India on definition of authorized entity
  • Quick Notes from NGOs intervention from the floor during SCCR24
  • Quick Update on WIPO SCCR 24 Meeting on The treaty for People with Disabilities
  • SCCR 24: Focus is on “primary mission” of authorized entities
  • SCCR/24/9 Prov. The revised “instrument” for copyright exceptions for disabilties
  • SCCR24: India on Contribution of the SCCR to the implementation of the respective Development Agenda recommendations
  • SCCR24 points to a pathway for a diplomatic conference for VIPs; extraordinary GA to be held in December 2012
  • SCCR24: Opening statement of the African Group
  • SCCR24: Plenary statement of Brazil urging WIPO to advance its negotations on a Treaty for the Visually Impaired (19 July 2012)
  • Time is running out at SCCR24 and there is a lot at stake
  • US position at WIPO on “the Nature of the Instrument” for copyright exceptions for disabilities
  • WIPO SCCR24 What is an “authorized entity” and what is the fight about?
  • WIPO SCCR24: TPMs, Contracts, new articles
  • WIPO SCCR24: still on “definitions” behind closed doors
  • Zimbabwe: Mr. Chair transparency is key to everything
  • Printer-friendly version Send by email Send by email